![]()
|
![]() ![]()
Home >
Newsletter Archive
> Current Newsletter
LOUISVILLE /JEFFERSON COUNTYDEMOCRATIC PARTY NEWSLETTERWeek of October 17, 2008The link to this electronic newsletter is being e-mailed to 6,500+ Jefferson County Democrats We hope you will forward the link to your own e-mail list. *********************************** CLICK HERE FOR CURRENT LIST OF EVENTS Updated on a regular basis
Bulletin Board:
The Truth About Voter Fraud
As the 2008 election process draws near -- and with early voting in many
states having already begun -- conservatives are raising a great hue and cry
about the threat of voter fraud.
Attacks have centered on the Association of Community Organizations for
Reform Now (ACORN), the "nation's
largest grassroots community organization of low- and moderate-income
people," whose workers have registered
1.3 million new voters this year. Conservatives like Rep. Tom Feeney
(R-FL) and former Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell have seized on
reports of improperly filled-out forms as evidence of "lawlessness"
and "voting fraud," which will lead to "the
kind of chaos you expect from a category-five hurricane." But mass voter
fraud is
just a conservative myth used to justify increasing the difficulty of the
voting process. In an interview with Salon, Lori Minnite, a professor of
political science at Barnard College who
investigated allegations of widespread voter fraud, explained, "From 2002
to 2005 only one person was found guilty of registration fraud. Twenty people
were found guilty of voting while ineligible and five people were found
guilty of voting more than once. That's
26 criminal voters -- voters who vote twice, impersonate other people,
vote without being a resident ... Meanwhile thousands of people are getting
turned away at the polls."
COMPLEX AND ONEROUS RULES: Although
the United States has a long and dark
history of voter disenfranchisement and voter suppression,
recent laws passed at the state and federal level have focused instead on
the
vaporous threat of voter fraud. These laws particularly discourage the
poor and
the young. Because voting, even for federal elections, is regulated by
state law and administered at the local level, there is
no consistent standard for
voting machines,
ballot design, the counting of
provisional ballots, or
voter identification. The 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requires that
"any voter who has not previously voted in a federal election"
must provide a form of ID. But "twenty-four
states have broader voter identification requirements than what HAVA
mandates" -- seven require photo ID for all voters, and 17 more require some
form of ID. In April, the U.S. Supreme Court
upheld Indiana's draconian photo ID law that could disenfranchise as many
as 400,000 voters, although Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita "conceded
the state has
never presented a case of 'voter impersonation.'" In his dissent, Justice
David Souter compared Indiana's unjustified regulations to a poll tax,
"because it correlates with no state interest so well as it does with the
object of
deterring poorer residents from exercising the franchise."
MASS DISENFRANCHISEMENT AND INTIMIDATION:
Last week, the New York Times reported that "[t]ens
of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been
removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that
appear to violate federal law." Last Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Donald
Molloy issued a scathing order Wednesday "lambasting the
ROVE'S FINGERPRINTS: The Department of Justice, whose responsibilities include ensuring the right to fair elections, was subverted by the Bush administration to pursue the false threat of voter fraud. In 2002, former attorney general John Ashcroft announced an initiative that required "all components of the Department" to "place a high priority on the investigation and prosecution of election fraud." The 2006 purge of eight U.S. attorneys -- all lifelong Republicans -- at the behest of the Bush White House exposed the depths of this politicization. The White House justified the dismissals by telling reporters, "President Bush mentioned to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales in October that he had heard complaints from Congress that some federal prosecutors were lax in pursuing voter fraud." As the Washington Post reported last year, "Nearly half the U.S. attorneys slated for removal by the administration last year were targets of Republican complaints that they were lax on voter fraud, including efforts by presidential adviser Karl Rove to encourage more prosecutions of election-law violations," Rove has made it his specialty to raise the specter of vote fraud throughout his political career, from his days working on state races in Alabama.
THE MAN BEHIND THE WHISPERS ABOUT OBAMA,
By: Jim Ruttenberg
The most persistent falsehood about Senator
Barack Obama’s background first hit in
2004 just two weeks after the Democratic convention speech that helped
set him on the path to his presidential candidacy: “Obama is a Muslim
who has concealed his religion.”
That statement, contained in a press release, spun a complex tale about
the ancestry of Mr. Obama, who is Christian.
The press release was picked up by a conservative Web site,
FreeRepublic.com, and spread steadily as
others elaborated on its claims over the years in e-mail messages, Web
sites and books. It continues to drive other false rumors about Mr.
Obama’s background.
Just last Friday, a woman told Senator
John McCain at a town-hall-style meeting,
“I have read about him,” and “he’s an Arab.” Mr. McCain corrected her.
Until this month, the man who is widely credited with starting the
cyberwhisper campaign that still dogs Mr. Obama was a secondary
character in news reports, with deep explorations of his background
largely confined to liberal blogs.
But an appearance in a documentary-style program on the Fox News Channel
watched by three million people last week thrust the man, Andy Martin,
and his past into the foreground. The program allowed Mr. Martin to
assert falsely and without challenge that Mr. Obama had once trained to
overthrow the government.
An examination of legal documents and election filings, along with
interviews with his acquaintances, revealed Mr. Martin, 62, to be a man
with a history of scintillating if not always factual claims. He has
left a trail of animosity — some of it provoked by anti-Jewish comments
— among political leaders, lawyers and judges in three states over more
than 30 years.
He is a law school graduate, but his admission to the Illinois bar was
blocked in the 1970s after a psychiatric finding of “moderately severe
character defect manifested by well-documented ideation with a paranoid
flavor and a grandiose character.”
Though he is not a lawyer, Mr. Martin went on to become a prodigious
filer of lawsuits, and he made unsuccessful attempts to win public
office for both parties in three states, as well as for president at
least twice, in 1988 and 2000. Based in Chicago, he now identifies
himself as a writer who focuses on his anti-Obama Web site and press
releases.
Mr. Martin, in a series of interviews, did not dispute his influence in
Obama rumors.
“Everybody uses my research as a takeoff point,” Mr. Martin said,
adding, however, that some take his writings “and exaggerate them to
suit their own fantasies.”
As for his background, he said: “I’m a colorful person. There’s always
somebody who has a legitimate cause in their mind to be angry with me.”
When questions were raised last week about Mr. Martin’s appearance and
claims on “Hannity’s America” on Fox News, the program’s producer said
Mr. Martin was clearly expressing his opinion and not necessarily fact.
It was not Mr. Martin’s first turn on national television. The CBS News
program “48 Hours” in 1993 devoted an hourlong program to what it called
his prolific filing of frivolous lawsuits. He has filed so many lawsuits
that a judge barred him from doing so in any federal court without
preliminary approval.
He prepared to run as a Democrat for Congress in Connecticut, where
paperwork for one of his campaign committees listed as one purpose “to
exterminate Jew power.” He ran as a Republican for the
Florida State Senate and the
United States Senate in Illinois. When
running for president in 1999, he aired a television advertisement in
New Hampshire that accused
George W. Bush of using cocaine.
In the 1990s, Mr. Martin was jailed in a case in Florida involving a
physical altercation.
His newfound prominence, and the persistence of his line of political
attack — updated regularly on his Web site and through press releases —
amazes those from his past.
“Well, that’s just a bookend for me,” said Tom Slade, a former chairman
of the Florida
Republican Party, whom Mr. Martin sued for
refusing to support him. Mr. Slade said Mr. Martin was driven like “a
run-over dog, but he’s fearless.”
Given Mr. Obama’s unusual background, which was the focus of his first
book, it was perhaps bound to become fodder for some opposed to his
candidacy.
Mr. Obama was raised mostly by his white mother, an atheist, and his
grandparents, who were Protestant, in Hawaii. He hardly knew his father,
a Kenyan from a Muslim family who variously considered himself atheist
or agnostic, Mr. Obama wrote. For a few childhood years, Mr. Obama lived
in Indonesia with a stepfather he described as loosely following a
liberal Islam.
Theories about Mr. Obama’s background have taken on a life of their own.
But independent analysts seeking the origins of the cyberspace attacks
wind up at Mr. Martin’s first press release, posted on the Free Republic
Web site in August 2004.
Its general outlines have turned up in a host of works that have
expounded falsely on Mr. Obama’s heritage or supposed attempts to
conceal it, including “Obama Nation,” the widely discredited best seller
about Mr. Obama by
Jerome R. Corsi. Mr. Corsi opens the book
with a quote from Mr. Martin.
“What he’s generating gets picked up in other places,” said Danielle
Allen, a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study at
Princeton University who has investigated
the e-mail campaign’s circulation and origins, “and it’s an example of
how the Internet has given power to sources we would have never taken
seriously at another point in time.”
Ms. Allen said Mr. Martin’s original work found amplification in 2006,
when a man named Ted Sampley wrote an article painting Mr. Obama as a
secret practitioner of Islam. Quoting liberally from Mr. Martin, the
article circulated on the Internet, and its contents eventually found
their way into various e-mail messages, particularly an added claim that
Mr. Obama had attended “Jakarta’s Muslim Wahhabi schools. Wahhabism is
the radical teaching that created the Muslim terrorists who are now
waging jihad on the rest of the world.”
Mr. Obama for two years attended a Catholic school in Indonesia, where
he was taught about the Bible, he wrote in “Dreams From My Father,” and
for two years went to an Indonesian public school open to all religions,
where he was taught about the Koran.
Mr. Sampley, coincidentally, is a Vietnam veteran and longtime opponent
of Mr. McCain and Senator
John Kerry, both of whom he accused of
ignoring his claims that American prisoners were left behind in Vietnam.
He previously portrayed Mr. McCain as a “Manchurian candidate.” Speaking
of Mr. Martin’s influence on his Obama writings, Mr. Sampley said, “I
keyed off of his work.”
Mr. Martin’s depictions of Mr. Obama as a secret Muslim have found
resonance among some Jewish voters who have received e-mail messages
containing various versions of his initial theory, often by new authors
and with new twists.
In his original press release, Mr. Martin wrote that he was personally
“a strong supporter of the Muslim community.” But, he wrote of Mr.
Obama, “it may well be that his concealment is meant to endanger
Israel.” He added, “His Muslim religion would obviously raise serious
questions in many Jewish circles.”
Yet in various court papers, Mr. Martin had impugned Jews.
A motion he filed in a 1983 bankruptcy case called the judge “a
crooked, slimy Jew who has a history of lying and thieving common to
members of his race.”
In another motion, filed in 1983, Mr. Martin wrote, “I am able to
understand how the Holocaust took place, and with every passing day
feel less and less sorry that it did.”
In an interview, Mr. Martin denied some statements against Jews
attributed to him in court papers, blaming malicious judges for
inserting them.
But in his “48 Hours” interview in 1993, he affirmed a different
anti-Semitic part of the affidavit that included the line about the
Holocaust, saying, “The record speaks for itself.”
When asked Friday about an assertion in his court papers that “Jews,
historically and in daily living, act through clans and in wolf pack
syndrome,” he said, “That one sort of rings a bell.”
He said he was not anti-Semitic. “I was trying to show that everybody
in the bankruptcy court was Jewish and I was not Jewish,” he said,
“and I was being victimized by religious bias.”
In discussing the denial of his admission to the Illinois bar, Mr.
Martin said the psychiatric exam listing him as having a “moderately
severe personality defect” was spitefully written by an evaluator he
had clashed with.
Mr. Martin, who says he is from a well-off banking and farming family,
is clearly pleased with his newfound attention. But, he said, others
have added to his work in “scary” ways.
“They Google ‘Islam’ and ‘Obama’ and my stuff comes up and they take
that and kind of use that — like a Christmas tree, and they decorate
it,” he said. For instance, he said, he did not necessarily ascribe to
a widely circulated e-mail message from the Israeli right-wing
activist Ruth Matar, which includes the false assertion, “If Obama
were elected, he would be the first Arab-American president.”
He said he had at least come to “accept” Mr. Obama’s word that he had
found Jesus Christ. His intent, he said, was only to educate.
Let Them Eat Pedicures by Tula Connell How appropriate Sen. John McCain didn’t mention the words “middle class” in this week’s presidential debate—or in the first presidential debate. Because as a proponent of and heir to the greedy, corrupt, rich-first regime of the past eight years, McCain and the conservative ideologues, who he’s trying to distance himself from to win the election, are reaping the rotten fruits of policies that have systematically devastated the sound financial foundations of America’s working families. Just to note a few: Tax policies that encourage corporations to ship family-supporting U.S. jobs overseas. Payoffs to the CEO class and their country club buddies through massive tax cuts for the wealthy—excessive expenditures that provide reactionaries a convenient excuse for shortchanging programs for children’s health coverage or affordable prescription medication for seniors or an expanded safety net for the growing numbers of unemployed workers. Chaos and destruction in the financial world that may mean few of us get pensions. The recent financial debacle has wiped out $2 trillion in our pension savings in the past 15 months. Rather than retire at age 65, many of us will be forced to work until we die, repeating variations of: Welcome to Big Burger. How can I help you? The Bush regime has fostered more than a “culture” of corporate excess. When AIG executives went to a luxury resort and spent nearly $500,000 on manicures, facials, pedicures and massages one week after accepting an $85 billion bailout by U.S. taxpayers—whose funds the Treasury Department used to save the corporation destroyed by CEO greed—that’s a culture of hate. Hate for the millions of America’s working families whose American Dream has been clipped along with the pedicured toes of multibillionaire CEOs. Hate fostered by a reactionary vision of government that shuns civic citizenship in favor of corporate cronyism. Because rather than punish AIG for its egregious display of contempt for middle-class taxpayers, the Bush Treasury Department ideologues hand the company another $38 billion. And in another demonstration of total disdain for the country, the economy and the people on whose backs AIG is treading, the corporation had planned another luxury retreat next week, before backing down. We are less than 30 days away from an election that will determine whether the middle class survives—and with it, the nation. As he often does, Glenn Greenwald pithily identifies the current political milieu when he describes the worldview gulf between the Republican punditocracy and America’s voters: What’s happening in this country, and in this election, is rather simple and easy to see: (1) the country is in total shambles—possibly far worse than what people even realize; (2) we have lived for the last eight years under virtually absolute GOP rule; (3) the public knows this; (4) the Republican President and his party are therefore intensely—historically—unpopular; and (5) the voting public doesn’t want to continue living under the rule of the same faction and same political party that has driven the country into the ground. Some cynics have said disasters like the Bush administration are the risks of democracy. But a populace force-fed incessant media spin by talking heads who back corporate puppet-presidents is not the informed democracy essential for clear decisions at the ballot box. This election, no amount of mainstream media bias can gloss over the failed state of the nation. And along with the union movement’s massive get out the vote effort, and all the outreach and candidate fundraising by the progressive community, now is the time we, the people, can take back America from reactionary ideologues. In the hours before Tuesday’s debate, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews relentlessly greased the wheels for Republican pundits to pontificate on the key question for the insider clique: What must McCain do to win the debate? Later, Matthews went outside the TV studio to interview people in the Nashville, Tenn., crowd. As one after another expressed support for Sen. Barack Obama and opposition to Bush/McCain, his irritation visibly grew, until he finally spit out what he was thinking: Where are the McCain supporters? A man in the crowd answered: It’s like Michigan. McCain supporters are all gone. The people speak.
McCain Transition Head Lobbied For Saddam Hussein
Back in August, John McCain tried to make an issue out of the fact that one of Barack Obama’s foreign policy advisers, former U.S. ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer, had attended a legal conference in Damascus in July. The attempt never went anywhere — in addition to being a total non-story charge, the geniuses working for McCain fumbled the press call by hanging up on a reporter who was asking inconvenient questions about the lobbying work of various McCain staffers and surrogates.
Today, the Huffington Post’s Murray Waas reports that one of those staffers, William Timmons, the Washington lobbyist heading up McCain’s presidential transition team, “aided an influence effort on behalf of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to ease international sanctions against his regime“:
The two lobbyists who Timmons worked closely with over a five year period on the lobbying campaign later either pleaded guilty to or were convicted of federal criminal charges that they had acted as unregistered agents of Saddam Hussein’s government.
During the same period beginning in 1992, Timmons worked closely with the two lobbyists, Samir Vincent and Tongsun Park, on a previously unreported prospective deal with the Iraqis in which they hoped to be awarded a contract to purchase and resell Iraqi oil. Timmons, Vincent, and Park stood to share at least $45 million if the business deal went through.
Timmons’ activities occurred in the years following the first Gulf War, when Washington considered Iraq to be a rogue enemy state and a sponsor of terrorism.
Waas also reports that “proposals that Timmons himself circulated to U.S. officials as part of the effort were written with the assistance of…Iraqi officials, and were also sent ahead of time with Timmons’ approval to [Saddam Hussein’s Deputy Prime Minister Tariq] Aziz.” Interestingly, a few years after Timmons worked with Iraqi officials to implement U.S. legislation to ease sanctions on Saddam Hussein, McCain foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann worked with Iraqi exiles to implement U.S. legislation to remove Saddam Hussein. Now that’s diversity!
Record number eligible to vote in Ky. By Tom Loftus
A record number of Kentuckians are
registered to vote in the Nov. 4 election,
Secretary of State Grayson said in a news release that 2,906,809 Kentuckians are registered — an increase of 49,578, or 1.7 percent, from the 2,857,231 voters registered for the primary election last spring. The current number of registered voters is an increase of 112,523, or 4 percent, over the 2004 presidential election, according to the news release.
“These healthy registration
figures are an indication of a potentially strong turnout on election day,”
Grayson stated in the news release. And 57.2 percent are Democrats and 36.3 percent are Republicans, with the others independent or affiliated with other groups.
The
Democratic Party showed a larger gain in registration than
the GOP since the primary. Democrats gained 32,248 registered voters, or 2
percent, since the primary. Republicans saw 13,433 more registered voters
since the primary, a gain of 1.3 percent. Since the last presidential election, in 2004, the Republican Party has seen larger gains in registered voters in the state. During that time Republican registration has grown by 57,208, or 5.7 percent. Democratic registration has grown by 46,744, or 2.9 percent, and registration for others has grown by 8,571, or 4.7 percent.
McCain Would Slash Medicare by Seth Michaels
This week, in the midst of Sen. John McCain’s misleading assaults on Sen. Barack Obama, his campaign let slip yet another revelation of exactly where their priorities are. One of McCain’s top advisers this week said that as president, McCain would cut $1.3 trillion from Medicare and Medicaid.
That’s “trillion.” With a “T.”
More than 10 years, McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the Wall Street Journal, McCain would pay for the high costs of his health care proposal by taking a hatchet to health care coverage for the elderly, people with disabilities and lower-income families. A Center for American Progress study finds that McCain’s plan would force big cuts in benefits or eligibility for these vulnerable populations.
McCain’s call for radical cuts to Medicare and Medicaid will undermine their vital role in our health care system, putting affordable health care out of reach for millions of seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families, and driving up the cost of health insurance for everyone else. And why does the McCain campaign support undermining this pillar of retirement security? To pay for a “tax credit” in McCain’s health care plan that amounts to a subsidy for big insurance companies. (Maybe McCain thinks the $2 billion in tax cuts he would give the insurance companies isn’t enough.)
Ed Coyle, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, calls McCain’s Medicare plans “terrible news” for seniors already beset by rising costs and economic anxiety.
Medicare, like Social Security, is one of our nation’s greatest success stories. Generations of seniors have been able to better afford their doctor visits and prescription drugs. Medicare works, and as part of national health care reform, we need to strengthen Medicare—not decimate it. As the McCain health care plan would also cause many employers to drop retiree health care, a stronger Medicare program would be needed more than ever. This major threat to Medicare is the dirty little secret John McCain and his team of lobbyists didn’t want us to know about. When it comes to retirement security and health care, McCain’s plans are as bafflingly out of touch as his Senate voting record. He wants to put retirement at risk by gambling Social Security in volatile markets. He opposes expanding health care for children and has opposed enabling Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices. He wants to create a new health care tax that could push millions out of their benefits, and his so-called tax credit would cover less than half of what an average family premium would cost. And McCain wants to pay for it all by demolishing the health coverage millions of retirees depend on. In contrast, Obama has a strong record of protecting retirees and their health care, and he’s pledged to fight benefit cuts in Social Security and Medicare. He’s proposed a health care plan that cuts costs for families and gives more people access to affordable, high-quality coverage. It’s clear that Obama understands that in tough economic times, we need to keep working families and retirees secure by making sure we have a strong and stable health care system. McCain thinks the right answer is to push more and more people out of their current coverage and leave them, young and old alike, at the mercy of the insurance companies. He just doesn’t get it.
Comments:
HOW ABOUT THIS????
ECONOMY -- LEHMAN BROS. APPROVED $100 MILLION EXECUTIVE PAYOUT DAYS BEFORE BANKRUPTCY: The Times of London reports that the Lehman Brothers board "signed off on more than $100m (£59m) in payouts to five top executives just three days before the bank went bankrupt leaving thousands of employees out of work." While the executives ultimately never received the payments because the Wall Street giant filed for bankruptcy, "the pay deals will further inflame the debate raging about executive pay as the global financial crisis accelerates." In fact, in the two years prior to Lehman's collapse, the same executives "were generously remunerated while overseeing forays into risky commercial real-estate investments that helped to bring the company down." Nonetheless, Lehman wasn't the only big time financial firm operating unheaded despite the current financial crisis. Last week, a House committee discovered that, just one week after the federal government bailed out insurance giant AIG, company executives went on a retreat to a luxury resort costing nearly $500,000.
*******************
Pouring billions into aging U.S. infrastructure urged to help avoid
recession,
By MICHAEL
A. LINDENBERGER / The Dallas Morning News Would spending billions putting engineers and construction crews to work rebuilding the nation’s aging infrastructure keep America out of a recession? GET THE ANSWER HERE
DAILY GRILL
"I'm not sure if I were in the Congress I could vote against it." --
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich,
9/29/08, on the bailout VERSUS
******************
"Rove also mentioned the [actor's] use of the f-word, which Rove said he
can't remember ever hearing from Bush in 35 years." VERSUS
******************
GLENN BECK: How long has it taken us to go to a $10 trillion [debt]? ... How many years?
VERSUS "On the day President Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.727 trillion. The latest number from the Treasury Department shows the national debt now stands at more than $9.849 trillion. That's a 71.9 percent increase on Mr. Bush's watch." -- CBS News, 9/29/08
Quotes of the Day
Recent Senate Votes
NOT IN SESSION
Recent House Votes
NOT IN SESSION
HUMOR
"Yesterday at the White House -- you know,
George Bush is still our President for a couple of more months -- and
yesterday down in Washington in the White House, he met with Italian Prime
Minister Berlusconi, but Bush kept calling him Boy-R-Dee. It was awful."
--David Letterman
"This economy is crazy. Are you with me on that one? This is what I saw
today. I saw a Lehman Brothers executive walking around town wearing a sign
that read, will work for a seven-figure bonus." --Jay Leno
A LONG-RUNNING CAMPAIGN: Last Friday, conservative members of Congress "sent a letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey requesting the Department of Justice ensure that the actions of ACORN did not violate federal laws." But conservatives have gone down this road before, only to find nothing. In 2004, ACORN faced three lawsuits pertaining to alleged voter fraud, all of which were dismissed. As noted at the time, "several politically motivated law firms brought baseless charges of voter registration fraud against ACORN in an effort to inhibit its work to register low-income and minority voters." But the Bush administration was so intent on furthering these trumped-up charges of voter fraud that in 2006 attorneys from the Department of Justice -- including New Mexico's David Iglesias -- were fired for not pursuing fraud cases "to the satisfaction of their bosses." Revealing the shallowness of the conservative outrage though, the New York Times reported last week that "tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law." This has garnered scant attention compared to the uproar surrounding ACORN
ADMINISTRATION -- GELLMAN: CHENEY WOULD SEE BAILOUT AS OPPORTUNITY TO
REINFORCE UNITARY EXECUTIVE: Vice President Cheney has virtually
disappeared from the public spotlight since last month's economic collapse.
Although he has given
seven public speeches since September 1, none were devoted to the
economy. Cheney's absence is puzzling considering his major role in crafting
economic policy during the
first term. Late last week, The Progress Report asked the Washington
Post's
Barton Gellman, author of the new book,
Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency, about Cheney's disappearance.
Gellman suggested Cheney has become a less influential figure in the White
House and Congress, handicapped by his
abysmal approval ratings. Gellman cautioned, however, that Cheney
"probably is involved behind the scenes in shaping the policy because there
hasn't been many massive policies that he hasn't helped shape." In reference
to the original Wall Street bailout plan, which would have given the
Treasury
enormous powers with no oversight, Gellman noted that Cheney may have
viewed the bailout as an "opportunity" to expand executive power. "He would
certainly also see [the financial crisis] as an opportunity to demonstrate
and reinforce that
the executive needs to be supreme on big consequential national policy,"
Gellman said.
Think Fast
A draft version of the new National Intelligence Estimate "concludes that Afghanistan is in a 'downward spiral' and casts serious doubt on the ability of the Afghan government to stem the rise in the Taliban’s influence there." The CIA has documented the worsening violence for nearly 2 years and “some in the agency say they believe that it has taken the White House too long to respond to the warnings."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) yesterday recommended a new $150 billion economic stimulus plan and said "she may call the House into session after the election to pass it." Pelosi said "the stock market meltdown...was a factor in her recommendation."
Delivering "a sharp blow" to the prosecution's case against Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), a judge threw out two key pieces of evidence against Stevens yesterday. The judge presiding over the case faulted prosecutors for knowingly introducing false documents relating to work done on Stevens home. "There’s just no excuse for that whatsoever," he said.
“Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law," the New York Times reports today. The blocked voters "are apparently the result of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the states tried to comply with a 2002 federal law."
Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-FL) -- who replaced former congressman Mark Foley (R) -- "is facing scandalous allegations of his own." ABC News reports Mahoney paid $121,000 to "a former mistress who worked on his staff and was threatening to sue him." He has called on the House ethics committee to investigate his own behavior.
Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-FL), "who faces accusations that he had an affair with a former aide and paid her to keep quiet about it," was also reportedly "having an affair with a second woman around the same time, a person close to his campaign told The Associated Press on Tuesday."
A record 91 percent of Americans are "dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States," according to a new USA Today/Gallup poll. Another 84 percent of those polled "predict the economy is going to get worse."
"House Democrats are contemplating a huge infusion of public cash -- as much as $300 billion -- to stoke economic growth by creating public jobs and padding the wallets of struggling consumers." The spending package “would be nearly twice as big as the stimulus measure President Bush signed in February."
The number of U.S. jobs paying a poverty-level wage increased by 4.7 million between 2002 and 2006, according to a new report by The Working Poor Families Project. "The alarming news is that both the number and percentage of low-income families increased during this period," said Brandon Roberts, co-author of the report. "This was a time when we had solid and robust economic growth."
Bush administration officials, in their last weeks in office, "are pushing to rewrite a wide array of federal rules with changes or additions that could block product-safety lawsuits by consumers and states." The language is "aimed at pre-empting product-liability litigation into 50 rules governing everything from motorcycle brakes to pain medicine."
INTERESTING
|