![]()
|
![]() ![]()
Home >
Newsletter Archive
> Current Newsletter
LOUISVILLE /JEFFERSON COUNTYDEMOCRATIC PARTY NEWSLETTERWeek of March 30, 2008The link to this electronic newsletter is being e-mailed to 5,500+ Jefferson County Democrats We hope you will forward the link to your own e-mail list. *********************************** CLICK HERE FOR CURRENT LIST OF EVENTS Updated on a regular basis
Bulletin Board:
2008 Kentucky Democratic Party Reorganization Handbook
The 2008 Health Care for America Survey
results are in. And the findings expose a health care system that costs too much, covers too little, leaves too many behind and is getting worse. The results deliver a mandate for health care reform to everyone who wants the support of working families in this year’s elections.
Please take a moment to read the full survey results and health care stories. Learn how working families can win secure, high-quality health care for all in 2009 if we make the 2008 elections a mandate for health care reform.
Secretary-Treasurer Trumka: Here’s What Ails Corporate America Patrick O’Meara, corporate finance specialist in the AFL-CIO Office of Investment, highlights a CNBC discussion by AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka on the need for making it clear that excessive CEO pay plays a key role in our nation’s credit crisis. In a recent appearance on CNBC, AFL-CIO Secretary Treasurer Rich Trumka explained how the issue of excessive executive pay must be front and center in any honest discussion of the causes of the credit crisis now threatening the health of our economy. If CEOs are rewarded for putting at risk our companies—and, as we now see, even our financial system—they will not hesitate to do it. Shareholders and government regulatory agencies need to be able to make sure that CEOs are not given the wrong incentives. As Trumka notes, shareholders at many companies are now submitting resolutions asking that shareholders be given a say on pay, that is, a vote on whether they approve the compensation packages of the top executives. But he points out this is not enough, because these votes are only advisory. What really is needed to fix corporate culture is proxy access. This is another way of saying that shareholders should be allowed in practice, not just in theory, to pick directors who really will look out for shareholder value and the long-term interests of the company. Right now, the system is rigged so that the status quo cannot be changed. There also is a need for a thoughtful reregulation of the financial sector, Trumka points out. This does not mean the government needs to put corporate activity in a straightjacket. But time and again, the leadership at corporations has shown it is incapable of regulating itself. We do not need to keep learning the same lesson over again. Some regulation, especially with respect to CEO pay, is in the best interest of everyone. We want the people running our companies to be talented, but we also need them to be willing to play by the rules.
BREAKING: Condi Rice Flirts With VP Possibility -- Speaks to Grover Norquist's Wednesday Group Meeting
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is speaking to Grover Norquist's
weekly powerhouse gathering at
Americans for Tax Reform
of conservative associations, think tanks, and political operations.
At the semi-secret gatherings which Republican political hopefuls migrate to to get the blessing of not only Norquist but the diverse parts of the nation's conservative money and political machinery, Norquist gives everyone in the room 3 minutes to pitch their cause or issue. I have attended before, but if one wants to attend again -- no one may write or speak about the internal discussion or who attended. In this case, however, I am not attending -- but a source other than Norquist has leaked this information to The Washington Note and Huffington Post.
As one major Republican operative told me yesterday:
Grover Norquist is author of the new book, Leave Us Alone: Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives. It would be interesting to know which pages of the book Condi has dog-eared.
-- Steve Clemons Source
Comments: None this week
DAILY GRILL
"[A]ttacks on American
forces are down [in Iraq]. ... The surge is working." -- President Bush,
3/19/08
*****************************
"Following weeks of oil prices hitting over $100 a
barrel, Vice President Dick Cheney met Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah on
Friday 'for talks that will include discussions on cooperation to stabilize
the oil market.'" -- Reuters,
3/21/08
******************************
"Newly declassified documents captured in Iraq show that Saddam Hussein's
regime had extensive ties with a variety of Islamist and other terrorist
groups."
*********************************
"He has never said that this war would be easy. He has been the guy
saying for four years that we’re getting it wrong. We need more troops."
-- Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC),
3/25/08
Q
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||
|
|
On April 5th, the WakeUpWalMart.com campaign will celebrate three years of making Wal-Mart a more responsible company. As you know, it's been a grueling fight for substantive change at Wal-Mart. And, for all of the movement's success, we still have one question for you.
Is Wal-Mart helping you "live better?"
Your tax dollars are still subsidizing Wal-Mart's health care crisis. Your good jobs are still being shipped overseas so Wal-Mart can import over 70% of its goods from communist China. Your neighbors are still earning poverty-level Wal-Mart wages so America's richest family can line their pockets with Wal-Mart's $12 billion in profits.
Are you living better yet?
This year, we can't settle for anything less than real change from Wal-Mart. We know change won't come unless we work together to bring our campaign's message to new audiences in new ways. That's why we're launching the first in a series of new WakeUpWalMart.com videos: "Living Better." Please, do your part and pass it along.
Watch "Living Better" and help us spread the word
Consider this a taste of the year to come. In the coming months, you will see a series of bold new videos from WakeUpWalMart.com, all with one mission--to introduce consumers to the real Wal-Mart.
Remember, we can't do that without your help. Supporters like you are the driving force behind the movement to change Wal-Mart. So, check out the video, and help us spread the word. Your action and our message can force Wal-Mart to change, and help forge a better America.
Watch "Living Better" today and send the video to your friends
Here's to round 4 in the fight to change Wal-Mart!
And, as always, thanks for all that you do.
The Team |
|
|
![]() |
|
||
Buy American Mention of the Week
'Free trade' that isn't free
'Neither tariffs nor
trade protection is the problem'
Along with the ever-increasing volume of imports into this country are the ever-increasing hits to the free trade faith among the people in it. The free trade, free market fall from grace didn't just begin with fears of a 2008 recession, but it might come to a decisive and definitive close with the 2008 elections.
It's no surprise Americans are becoming more suspicious of foreign competition. A Sept. 5, 2007, poll as reported by the Associated Press showed 58 percent of Ohioans favor more restrictions on foreign imports, and that it would make Ohio's economy better. Free trade Republicans and especially John McCain should take note, for no Republican has ever won the presidency without winning Ohio.
But the American angst with free trade isn't limited to just one state. Eight-six-point-three percent of all Americans would like to block Chinese imports until they raise their product and food-safety standards to the level of U.S. standards, and according to a June 2007 Consumer Reports magazine poll 92 percent want country-of-origin labels on meat and produce. An August 7, 2007, Zogby poll showed one in three Americans would be willing to pay four times as much for American-made toys and 63 percent were willing to join a boycott of Chinese-made goods in general.
Part of what the faith in free trade and free markets has needed to endure is the ability of globalists to pull out the twin bogeymen of tariffs and protectionism at will as the great bringers of the Great Depression. In the famous NAFTA debate between Al Gore and Ross Perot in 1993, Al Gore said the Smoot-Hawley tariff bill "was one of the principle causes, many economists say the principle cause, of the Great Depression in this country and around the world." But of course the undeniable, historical fact is that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were enacted over eight months after the Great Depression started. Even Ronald Reagan fell for the politically correct lie about the tariff bill when he said "the Smoot Hawley tariff helped bring on the Great Depression."
The "many economists" Al Gore spoke of that say the Smoot Hawley tariff bill caused the Great Depression don't appear to be among the most prominent. Nobel Prize winner and free trade advocate Milton Friedman blamed the Federal Reserve for bringing on the Great Depression. Former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said that it was brought on largely from mistakes the Federal Reserve made in tightening credit after the stock market crash of 1929. Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, who served in the Clinton/Gore White House as chairman of President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers, in his book "The Roaring Nineties," said the Great Depression was caused by insufficient government regulation rather than excessive government regulation. Tariffs, of course, are a form of government regulation. And most recently, current Fed chairman Ben Bernanke stated the Great Depression was caused by none other than the Federal Reserve.
These comments by Bernanke are nothing new. A Dec. 7, 2005, "Wall Street Journal" article about the current Federal Reserve chairman revealed that he is a self-described "Great Depression buff" much like the way others interested in American history are Civil War buffs. The article talked about a book Bernanke was going to write about the Great Depression, including the factors that caused it. The word "tariff" was nowhere to be found in the article.
What does all this mean in the light of America's faith in free trade and free markets, which is almost always accompanied by a repudiation of tariffs and trade protection? Neither tariffs nor trade protection is the problem. They weren't the problem in the 1930s and they aren't a policy problem to be feared today. As former Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said in an April 30, 2007, interview with "Business Week," "We have a tendency to under regulate. Then we have scandals, and we swing wildly in the other direction."
The recent Bear Sterns dilemma has free market advocates distancing themselves from free market rhetoric. On March 14 before the Fed intervened to bail out Bear Sterns, President Bush said, "In a free market, there's going to be good times and bad." After the Fed announced actions to stabilize the markets over the following weekend, Bush changed from talking about "free markets" on March 14 to calling them "financial markets" on March 17 while Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson spoke of "currency markets."
The problem is that our financial institutions, which President Bush described on March 17 as "strong" and "functioning efficiently and effectively," want a free market "hands-off" approach until problems arise, and then they want the government to intervene with a "hands-on" approach. Then the Fed rushes in with taxpayer money where we aid private U.S. banks with public U.S. tax dollars. What this proves is that we don't have a free market system at all. "Free" would mean "without cost," and the taxpayer bailout will cost us all. It's just that no one knows exactly how much yet.
Even after the Bear Sterns bailout, Bush continues to warn us of "trade protection" as the primary danger to America's supposedly strong economic fundamentals. John McCain warns against proposals to renegotiate NAFTA because it might compromise U.S. exports. If you've ever played poker, you know that everyone who sits at the table has to ante-up the same amount to share in the pot.
In this case, the pot is the lucrative U.S. market. Mexican producers don't ante up the same amount as American producers for the privilege of competing for the same market. Mexican producers have a lower-cost access to the U.S. market than American producers, which is blatantly unfair to American companies who wish to keep their factories in America and employ their own people. To claim that we should avoid amending an unfair trading system merely because it might compromise the success of any companies exporting to Mexico that might be benefiting from the unfair system is not the American way.
John McCain defends free trade by claiming NAFTA, which turned our mild trade surplus with Mexico to a large trade deficit, as a success. American tariffs and trade protection are not the problem. Lack of adequate tariffs to level the playing field by mindless faith in free trade and free markets followed by Federal Reserve intervention which can lead to catastrophes like the Great Depression is the problem. Capitalism, which is defined by Merriam-Webster as private or corporate ownership of capital goods, isn't violated by tariffs and regulation. It's violated by government ownership of private assets like those of JP Morgan and Bear Sterns. We wouldn't be in this predicament had we not blindly believed in free trade and free markets. America's founding fathers were trade protectionists, not free traders. Abraham Lincoln once said, "By the tariff system the whole revenue is paid by the consumer of foreign goods...the man who contents himself to live upon the products of his own country pays nothing at all." The founders realized that the terms "free trade" and "free markets" in any form are nowhere to be found in the U.S. Constitution.
John McCain is surely smart enough to realize this. After all, his mentor Teddy Roosevelt was quoted as saying duties (tariffs) "must never be reduced below the point that will cover the difference between the labor cost here and abroad." In today's terms, that means tariffs must never be cut to a point that would fail to level the playing field and make competition fair for all participants. According to the U.S. Constitution, we have a duty to regulate commerce with foreign nations. If we didn't have such a tendency to under regulate as Rudy Giuliani rightly pointed out, we would not have to swing so wildly in the other direction.
Roger Simmermaker is the author of How Americans Can Buy American: The Power of Consumer Patriotism. He also writes “Buy American Mention of the Week” articles for his website www.howtobuyamerican.com and is a member of the Machinists Union and National Writers Union. Roger has been a frequent guest on Fox News, CNN and MSNBC and has been quoted in the USA Today, Wall Street Journal and US News & World Report among many other publications, and is now a weekly contributor to WorldNetDaily.
![]()
During this critical political season, separating fact from fiction has never been more important. When a story breaks, you want to know the facts right away and spread them to your networks before the conservatives spin it all wrong. So, our partners at Think Progress launched the Wonk Room, the first public policy rapid response blog, to do just that; to give you the facts and arguments you need to be the most effective activist in town on key issues facing our nation, including climate, the economy, health care, and national security.
VIDEOS
McCain Revealed: The Briefing Book
O’Reilly: Media Matters, Huff Post, Daily Kos ‘are fascists’ and anti-American.
“Talk about anti-Americanism,” O’Reilly said referring to blogs, adding: “Media Matters, Huffington Post, DailyKos, I mean, these are fascists. They’re dishonest people.” Watch it:
CLICK HERE FOR LATEST ISSUE OF THE "FRIDAY ALERT"
NEED COMPUTER ASSISTANCE??
Democrat Activist Mike Bailey is now providing “Professional Computer Support.” He can be contacted at 502-558-4026, or mikebailey2000@usa.net.
Notice to our Readers & 2008 Primary Election Candidates:
This newsletter will carry, in this space, any Democratic candidates' notice of events or communications (250 words or less) to our readers that the candidate provides to the editor at rcrider@insightbb.com
If you plan to change your e-mail address, please let me know at rcrider@louisvilledem.com
Your contributions of news, comments and/or events are invited. Please e-mail such items to
Ray Crider at rcrider@louisvilledem.com . If you know someone who would like to be on the newsletter e-mail list, please have him or her supply the following information to the same
e-mail address: Name, address, phone numbers ( home , work, fax, cell), and e-mail address.
|
Not authorized by any candidate
or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Louisville/Jefferson County Democratic Party
are not tax deductible.
Copyright ©2008 The Louisville Jefferson County Democratic Party
"Paid for and Authorized by the Louisville and Jefferson County
Democratic Party."
Charles Horton, Treasurer - Tim Longmeyer, Chairman