Home >
Newsletter Archive
> Current Newsletter

LOUISVILLE /JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEMOCRATIC PARTY NEWSLETTER
Week
of March 16, 2008
The link to this electronic
newsletter is being e-mailed to 5,500+
Jefferson County Democrats
We hope you will forward the
link to your own e-mail list.
***********************************
CLICK HERE FOR CURRENT LIST OF EVENTS
Updated
on a regular basis
Bulletin Board:

-
The Louisville/Jefferson County Democratic
Executive Committee meets the 4th Wednesday of every month at
5:00 pm at
Democratic Headquarters,
-
640 Barret Avenue .

-
-
REMEMBER,
CHECK TO DONATE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
- ON YOUR STATE & FEDERAL TAX
RETURNS
Fischer, Cassaro Hold First Debate
By Mark Hebert

Last
week we reported that Elaine Chao
shirked her responsibilities with a
series of meetings that failed to address what really matters to
America’s workers. After meeting with George W. Bush, Elaine
addressed a group of Kentucky businesspeople in Washington, DC.
Elaine Chao is married to
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the Republican Senate leader who is
up for re-election in November; Elaine isn’t from Kentucky, but does
reside there with her husband.
We dug a little deeper, and found something curious. Elaine Chao
spoke to four Kentucky business groups on four separate occasions in
the last five months. Here’s her itinerary:
- An
October 4, 2007 speech to the Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce
in Paducah, Kentucky, where she bragged about doling out
non-competitive grants with taxpayer dollars.
-
- An
October 4, 2007 speech to the 23rd Annual Kentucky SHRM
Conference in Louisville, Kentucky, where she once again accused
American workers of having a “skills gap.”
-
- A
January 24, 2008 speech to the Greater Owensboro Chamber of
Commerce in Owensboro, Kentucky, where she highlighted the
“resiliency of our economy.”
-
- A
February 28, 2008 speech to the Northern Kentucky Chamber of
Commerce in Washington, DC, where she basically combined the three
previous speeches to Kentucky business interest groups into one.
(Is she short on material these days?)
That’s a lot of face-time for the Secretary of Labor to give to
residents of one particular state, even if it is her sometime
residence. While her husband is accountable only to the people of
Kentucky, Elaine is the Secretary of Labor of the whole country.
Besides, the same group of Kentuckians to whom Elaine spoke also met
with Mitch McConnell in his Senate office
that same day; why did they meet with each half of the power
couple, just hours apart?
Elaine’s speech holds
one possible clue: she mentions more than $5 million in grants
from the Department of Labor recently awarded to Central Kentucky.
That’s a lot of money for which I’m sure many Kentuckians are
grateful.
Unfortunately, we don’t have any details about the group’s
discussions with Sen. McConnell that same day. We’re sure their
conversations dealt only with policy issues, like the importance of
the $5 million influx to Kentucky’s economy from the Department of
Labor, and not with any issues concerning the Senator’s important
re-election campaign in November.
We sincerely hope the Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce
enjoyed its visit to Washington, DC last month. Meeting with both
the Senate Minority Leader and the Secretary of Labor on the same
day is quite the honor.
Oh, one more thing. We compiled this information just from what’s
posted on Elaine’s Department of Labor
website,
which does not have her full schedule. We wonder: what else
has Elaine been doing for her husband’s Senate campaign
while serving in her capacity as the Secretary of Labor?
Charlie
Cook's "Off To The Races"
Anyone who has watched American politics lately didn't particularly need to
see another piece of evidence proving just how challenging the political
environment is for Republicans.
But
Republican Jim Oberweis' loss to Democrat Bill Foster in Saturday's special
election in Illinois' 14th District -- for a seat held for over two decades
by former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R) -- is just one more example.
The heavily Republican district that President Bush carried with 55 percent
in 2004 gave Oberweis 47 percent, a big swing but not a surprising one given
Bush's high disapproval ratings.
It would be unfair to lay the blame for this loss solely on Bush and his
unpopularity, though.
A
weak candidate who had already lost two bids for the Senate and one for
governor, Oberweis had upside-down numbers -- higher unfavorable than
favorable ratings -- in some polls heading into the election and that was
probably a major contributing factor in his loss.
Had either Bush's approval ratings been higher or Republicans nominated a
candidate with less baggage, this seat likely wouldn't have turned over.
The National Republican Congressional Committee was forced to throw $1.2
million, roughly 20 percent of its total bank account balance, to defend a
seat that never should have been in play.
Probably the most on-target criticism of NRCC Chairman Tom Cole is that he
actually wanted this job and beat two rivals for it this cycle. Reps. Phil
English, R-Pa., and Pete Sessions, R-Texas, should be thanking their lucky
stars they came up short in the balloting.
Republicans should be alarmed over poll numbers measuring party
identification and enthusiasm of voters.
The advantage Democrats enjoy over Republicans in voter ID ranges from as
low as 8 points to as high as 14 points, depending upon the poll -- a lot
considering the parties were dead even five years ago.
A
just completed Cook Political Report/RT Strategies poll of 838 registered
voters conducted Wednesday through Sunday -- with a 3.5-point error margin
-- showed 37 percent identified themselves as Democrats, 28 percent as
Republicans and 31 percent said they were independents.
When figures were adjusted for independents who said which party they leaned
toward, Democrats rose to 50 percent and Republicans to 39 percent. Ten
percent stayed purely independent or wouldn't say.
Voting in the 2004 presidential election showed just how important party
identification can be.
Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts won the vote of 89 percent of
Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents, and Bush carried 93 percent of
the Republicans and GOP leaners. Even among white voters, the GOP edge was
just 2 points among party members, 3 points with leaners pushed.
Then there is enthusiasm.
In a presidential election year, it's a decent bet that Republicans, no
matter how demoralized, will turn out in numbers in line with past election
years.
When the GOP presidential race was still actively contested, Republican
turnout was solid and in some cases reached record highs. The danger for the
GOP is if there is an extraordinarily high Democratic turnout in the
general.
It's not hard to imagine that Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., could match the
national and state-by-state vote totals Bush received in 2004, or that the
Democratic nominee, either Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois or Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton of New York, might pick up a substantially higher vote count
than Kerry did four years ago.
The turnout figures in Democratic primaries and enthusiasm levels in
national polls certainly suggest that could be the case, and it would
obviously have a detrimental effect on GOP candidates down ballot.
Even if there isn't a disproportionate Democratic turnout, Republicans would
need to win over virtually all of the pure independents, quite a chore
considering they broke Democratic in 2006. If the turnout trends seen in the
primaries continue, that wouldn't even be enough.
While it is hard for a party to gain a lot of House seats in the election
following a big win, and the wave that Democrats used to regain the House
and Senate in 2006 certainly qualifies as big,one has to wonder in this
environment how many more they could get.
Currently, the Cook Political Report lists 22 Republican seats in three
competitive categories: 10 are "Tossups," another 11 are "Lean Republican"
(down from 12 after the Illinois 14th District loss) and the neighboring
open seat in Illinois' 11th District is in the "Lean Democratic" column.
Twenty-two more are in the potentially competitive category of "Likely
Republican."
While a single-digit seat gain for Democrats has been expected, the
potential for seat gains to creep into the teens appears to be growing, with
close to half of 26 open seats in danger and about two-dozen incumbents at
some degree of risk.
Considering the GOP fielded a flawed candidate in Oberweis, it is unwise to
extrapolate his loss nationally and begin predicting overblown gains for
Democrats. But the special election does serve as a reminder of just how
ugly the environment is for Republicans these days and provides a taste of
what a second bad election in a row for the GOP might look like.
McCain Revealed: The Briefing Book
Working families across this
country are facing all kinds of hardships: a staggering economy, stagnant
wages, a broken health care system, a home foreclosure and housing crisis, a
disastrously flawed U.S. trade policy and a hostile climate for workers
seeking to form unions.
But
someone must have forgotten to tell Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), who just
clinched the Republican presidential nomination. “I still believe our
fundamental underpinnings of our economy are strong,” McCain said recently.
It’s no wonder—McCain has
said economic issues are something he’s “never really understood.”
As the Democratic nomination
fight continues, it’s time working families understand John McCain’s poor
record on working family issues. Here’s a quick look:
-
McCain—Wrong on Trade: McCain has cast vote after vote for every free
trade agreement under the sun, including the most devastating agreement in
our history, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He has gone
on to praise NAFTA and its effects and has voted to make it easier for the
president to enter into agreements without strong worker protections.
-
McCain—Wrong on Workers: McCain voted to block the Employee Free
Choice Act and supported a national “right to work” for less law. He
supported President Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans while
voting against raising the minimum wage.
-
McCain—Wrong on Jobs: McCain has made it a point to tell audiences
that some jobs “aren’t coming back.” What he doesn’t often explain is his
role in exporting those jobs in the first place. McCain voted against
prohibiting the overseas outsourcing of government contracts and voted to
privatize federal jobs. He also voted to contract out federal jobs. And
McCain has certainly done little to aid those who have lost their jobs,
voting against the extension of federal unemployment insurance benefits.
-
McCain—Wrong on Social Security: McCain voted for Bush’s Social
Security privatization plan and says the only solution to fixing Social
Security is through private accounts.
-
McCain—Wrong on Health Care: McCain wants to make health care premiums
part of taxable income, creating a new tax for working families. His plan
would force working families to fend for themselves in the private
insurance market and undermine employer-based health care. In
addition, McCain has voted to slash funding for Medicare and opposed the
reauthorization and new funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance
Program (SCHIP).
- McCain—Wrong on George W.
Bush: Since President Bush took office; McCain has supported Bush’s
positions 89 percent of the time. McCain’s support of Bush’s policies
reached as high as 95 percent in 2007.
Over the coming weeks, we’ll
share more information with you about Sen. McCain’s record on the issues,
including the economy, jobs, health care, trade, workers’ rights and
retirement security.
For now, take a look at McCain
Revealed: The Briefing Book, and send it to your friends
and family.
McCain Stiffs U.S.
Workers, Helps Europeans Win Air Tanker Deal by
James Parks
At a
time when American
jobs are disappearing
and our
manufacturing
base is being decimated, working people are outraged that Republican
presidential nominee
John McCain
played a key role in the Bush Defense Department’s decision to award one of
our largest military contracts to a foreign company.
Had Boeing been awarded the air
tanker deal, it would have supported at least 44,000 new and existing
jobs in the United States, many of them good union jobs, and more than 300
suppliers in 40 states. But now only a few thousand lower-paying nonunion
jobs will be created. (Click
here to send a message to
your representatives in Congress, urging them to overturn this decision.)
The DOD
announced Feb. 29 the awarding of a $40 billion to $100 billion contract for
the construction of Air Force refueling tankers to Northrop Grumann and the
European firm EADS, which makes the Airbus. Defense expenditures are
supposed to comply with federal Buy American Law provisions, which require
purchasing certain products from American companies when possible. But this
administration has granted more waivers of the Buy American provisions than
any administration in history.
Time magazine
reports that McCain has been a “key figure” in the Pentagon’s attempt to
complete the tanker deal. According to the news magazine, McCain wrote
letters and pushed the Pentagon to change the bidding process so that
Airbus’s government subsidies could not be considered when deciding to whom
to award the contract. This placed Boeing, which receives no subsidies, at a
clear disadvantage and conflicted with U.S. trade policy. In fact, the U.S.
currently has a complaint before the World Trade Organization (WTO)
charging unfair trade practices resulting from
Airbus’s illegal subsidies.
READ
REST of STORY

CEOs Pocket Big Pay While Their Companies Tank by
Mike Hall
Three CEOs—Angelo
Mozilo of Countrywide Financial Corp.,
E. Stanley O’Neal
of Merrill Lynch and
Charles Prince
of Citigroup—presided over companies that lost a combined $20 billion in
just the past two quarters of 2007 as a result of investments in subprime
and other risky mortgages.
For that kind of performance, the CEO trio pocketed more than $320 million
in compensation, stock bonuses and other rewards last year. That disconnect
between performance and pay, says Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), shows that
there seems to be two different economic realties in this country. Most
Americans live in a world where economic security is precarious and there
are real economic consequences for failure. But our nation’s top executives
seem to live by a different set of rules.…CEOs seem to hit the lottery when
companies collapse.
Waxman made his remarks at his U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee’s hearing this morning on CEO pay and the mortgage crisis.
Today’s hearing on executive pay versus performance follows the committee’s
December examination of the roles and conflicts of corporate compensation
consultants in setting executive pay. (Click
here
to read the December 2007 AFL-CIO’s testimony;
here
for other testimony from the December hearing and
here
for more information from the AFL-CIO’s Executive PayWatch.)
Waxman says all three companies “bet heavily on the subprime market” and
suffered enormous losses. Countrywide lost $1.6 billion in 2007 and its
stock lost 80 percent of its value. Merrill Lynch lost $10 billion and its
stock lost 45 percent of its value. Citigroup also lost $10 billion and its
stock lost 48 percent of its value.
According to a report released by the committee yesterday, the companies’
nosedives paid off for the three CEOs. O’Neal and Prince pulled the rip
chords on their golden parachutes and resigned. Mozilo appears ready to do
the same as soon as Bank of America completes a deal to buy Countrywide.
The report shows that O’Neal left Merrill Lynch with a $161 million
retirement package. Prince was awarded a $10 million bonus, $28 million in
unvested stock options and $1.5 million in annual perquisites when he left
Citigroup. Mozilo received more than $120 million in compensation and sales
of Countrywide stock. Says Waxman:
Any reasonable relation between their compensation
and the interests of their shareholders appears to have broken down. The
obvious question is this: How can a few executives do so well when their
companies do so poorly?
Nell Minnow, co-founder of the Corporate Library, an independent group that
studies corporate governance and executive pay, describes herself as a
“passionate capitalist.” But she told the committee that not only is the
compensation the three received far out of line compared with performance,
it also should be returned to shareholders.
The undue compensation awarded to these failed
CEO’s should be returned to shareholders. In addition, they should be held
liable for providing false and misleading statements to investors and held
accountable for the impact of their poor strategic decision-making policies.
She also called for stronger shareholder rights in determining CEO pay
throughout the corporate world.
Now, shareholders only vote on stock options and
have no say over any other aspect of compensation. So directors have nothing
to lose by approving pay plans that pay off like perpetual pin-ball
machines, designed so that everything you hit rings a bell.
The committee report also found that Countrywide retained three compensation
consulting firms to develop Mozilo’s pay package. After the first two firms
made recommendations that apparently didn’t suit Mozilo, a third company was
retained that, the report says:
...appeared to serve as Mr. Mozilo’s personal
advisor with the goal of achieving “maximum opportunity” for Mr. Mozilo. The
final contract was significantly more generous than Exequity [the second
compensation firm] originally recommended.
During their testimony, the CEOs claimed reports of their pay were
exaggerated by the media. (Click
here
for more testimony from today’s hearing.)
But the committees’ report suggests that Mozilo is trying to deflect blame
onto unions—because we have been leading the way in many shareholder actions
seeking to hold corporate executives accountable.
The committee came across Mozilo’s twisted accusations while sorting through
various financial documents. In a 2006 e-mail, responding to an executive
compensation consultant who was disappointed that Countrywide’s board had
made revisions in Mozilo’s compensation package, Mozilo wrote:
boards have been placed under enormous pressure by
the left-wing, anti-business press and the envious leaders of unions and
other so called “CEO Comp Watchers.”
He
goes on to say that “a decade from now,” the public will realize how wrong
it was to attack honest “entrepreneurship.”
We’ll let Howard Leonard of Salon.com’s
How the World Works
column have the last word.
That e-mail was written on Oct. 20, 2006, well
before the astonishing decline and fall of Countrywide was apparent to
anyone outside of the company. Back then, perhaps Mozilo had some reason to
consider himself a titan of industry attacked by annoying communist termites
intent on destroying the American way of option-ARM, no-money-down mortgage
life.
But today, as the United States continues to
experience record numbers of home foreclosures, in part because of the
eagerness of companies like Countrywide to lure home buyers into mortgages
that they couldn’t afford, Mozilo’s petulance doesn’t come off too well. How
the World Works strongly believes that a decade from now, Angelo
Mozilo will be remembered as a pathetic icon of his time— man who “earned”
hundreds of millions of dollars while incompetently managing a public
company that was once the largest mortgage lender in the United States, but
now is just a footnote to the greatest housing bust since the Great
Depression.
Comments:
DAILY GRILL
"We don't know if this is
going to result in something that Congress will need to approve or not."
-- White House Press Secretary Dana Perino,
3/6/08, on a long term Iraq agreement
VERSUS
DELAHUNT: It's the position of this Administration that they do not need to
come before Congress to receive authorization?
SATTERFIELD: That's correct. -- Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-MA) to Amb. David
Satterfield,
3/4/08
*************************
"I think when people
take a look back at this moment in our economic history, they'll recognize
tax cuts work." -- President Bush,
3/12/08
VERSUS
"[M]aking the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and Alternative Minimum Tax relief
permanent would add $4.3 trillion to deficits and debt over just the next
ten years and would substantially worsen the nation's already serious
long-term fiscal problems." -- Center for Budget and Policy Priorities,
1/28/08
Quotes of the Day
Rove: ‘I Fully
Expect To Be Indicted By The End Of The Year’
Karl Rove, former senior aide to President Bush, spoke to a hostile crowd at
the University of Iowa yesterday evening. Students and local citizens
protested his appearance at the university and “staged
a mock trial” for Rove inside the student union before the speech.
During the lecture, Rove lashed out at hostile questioners, telling one man
his comment showed “a
simple, stupid mind” and chastised what he said were “stupid
statements” from the audience. Rove also said that former Amb. Joseph
Wilson “lied” about his
2002 trip to Niger and accused an audience member of “perpetuating
libel” on the U.S. military for asking about the real number of deaths
in the Iraq war: READ
THE REST
TOP
Recent Senate Votes
Consumer Product Safety Modernization Act - Vote Passed
(79-13, 8 Not Voting)

The Senate passed this legislation granting more funding and authority to
the Consumer Product Safety Commission and requiring mandatory testing of
consumer products for children.

Sen. Mitch McConnell voted
YES
Sen. Jim Bunning voted
NO
Recent House Votes
Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act - Vote
Passed (268-148, 13 Not Voting)

The House voted to require employee health plans to provide the same
coverage for mental illness as they do for physical health issues.

Rep. Ron Lewis voted
NO
Rep. John Yarmuth voted
YES
TOP
HUMOR

TOP
BORDERING ON A VIRTUAL
DISASTER: One of
the right wing's favorite "solutions" to undocumented immigration is the
border fence between the United States and Mexico. On March 14, 2007, McCain
lamented that undocumented immigrants were able to cross into Arizona
because his state did not "have
the fences and the barriers that they have in California and Texas." But
both the actual and "virtual" border fences are a mess. In October 2006,
Bush authorized the
construction of a 700-mile fence at the U.S.-Mexico border. Now,
however, the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) construction plans are
facing opposition from Texans who object to the
fence cutting through their property. U.S. attorneys acting on behalf of
the Bush administration have resorted to
filing lawsuits against resisting landowners. Conveniently, the border
fence in one small town would "abruptly
end" at the property owned by Dallas billionaire Ray L. Hunt, who was a
Bush-Cheney campaign "Pioneer" in
2000 and "donated $35 million to Southern Methodist University to
help build Bush's presidential library." Meanwhile, the virtual fence --
a "sophisticated
mix of radar, satellites, sensors and computers" -- is plagued by cost
overruns and delays. According to the Arizona Republic, "The $20 million
project was such a shambles that the government gave Boeing another $65
million in December to fix the glitches." The first phase was supposed be
completed by the end of 2008, but will now take another three years. Last
month, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff declared this project a
success.
IRAQ -- PERINO:
'DON'T KNOW' IF WHITE HOUSE WILL SEEK CONGRESS' APPROVAL FOR PERMANENT
OCCUPATION:
Earlier this week, State Dept. Coordinator for Iraq David Satterfield
refused to say whether it was "a
constitutional requirement" for the administration to "consult with
Congress" on a long-term agreement with Iraq. Yesterday morning on Fox News,
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino echoed Satterfield, saying that "we
don't know" whether Congress has any constitutional role in authorizing
such treating. In reality, the administration does know it will bypass
Congress. In a
follow-up letter to Satterfield's testimony obtained by The Progress
Report, Assistant Secretary of State Jeffrey Bergner said the President does
have "constitutional authority" to "continue combat operations" in Iraq
without Congress's authorization. As justification, Bergner cited the
2002 authorization of force against Saddam Hussein and the
resolution passed after 9/11. In defending the executive agreement,
Perino cited "the long-term relationship we have with countries
Japan and Germany and South Korea." Of course, these "strategic
framework agreements" were
approved by Congress first, as Oona Hathway of Yale Law School noted.
DODGING SOCIAL
SECURITY AND MEDICARE TAXES:
Despite the massive profits
KBR has been earning, it has worked hard to
shelter those revenues from the U.S. government and its own employees.
According a detailed investigation by the Boston Globe, KBR has "avoided
paying hundreds of millions of dollars in
federal Medicare and Social Security taxes by hiring workers through
shell companies" based in the Cayman Islands -- a scheme established by
Halliburton under
Cheney's tenure. In doing so, the firm deprived KBR employees of
guaranteed future retirement benefits and unemployment insurance should they
lose their jobs. Since at least 2004, the Pentagon has known about KBR's
practices, but has chosen to ignore the issue. The use of the shell
companies to divert millions from Social Security and Medicare gives KBR
an unfair advantage over its rivals, almost all of whom pay the federal
taxes. "It is both shocking and disappointing that some American companies
continue to exploit our system in wartime by setting up shell corporations
via a tax haven mailbox," said Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA). "You have to wonder
why the Pentagon continues to do business with these contractors who
skirt the rules."

ADMINISTRATION --
KARL ROVE RATTLED BY STUDENTS AND PROTESTERS AT UNIVERSITY OF IOWA SPEECH:
Students and
citizens protested former White House adviser Karl Rove before and during a
speech he gave last night at the University of Iowa. Before the speech,
"groups from around eastern Iowa had been
protesting his presence for two hours" and "protesters staged a mock
trial" for Rove inside the student union, draping the "side of a nearby
parking ramp with a 60-foot anti-Rove banner." Rove also received tough
questions from the audience. One attendee asked Rove about the "true" body
count in Iraq, prompting Rove to accuse the individual of "perpetuating
libel on the military of the United States by accusing them of killing
innocent Iraqis." Rove chastised what he said were "stupid
statements" from the audience and said a comment from one man showed "a
simple, stupid mind." Responding to a question about CIA operative
Valerie Plame Wilson's outing, Rove said, "I haven't been indicted yet, but
I fully expect to be by the end of the year." According to an agreement
with the university, "Rove only allowed journalists to videotape the first
few minutes of his remarks. After that, the media had to turn off all
cameras and tape recorders."
ADMINISTRATION --
BUSH UNPOPULARITY PROVIDES FUNDRAISING CHALLENGES FOR PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY: Southern
Methodist University in Dallas recently announced that the university will
be home to the George W. Bush presidential library. Bush's "censored"
library -- which will also house a partisan institute to "celebrate" Bush's
presidency -- is reportedly set to cost over $200 million. But U.S. News
reports that "Bush's friends are concerned that he will face serious
problems raising" the money needed for the library because his "unpopularity
will put a damper on donations" and "the sour economy will limit
contributions even more." Moreover, U.S. News notes that "there is the
matter of an endowment to keep the library going, which could cost an
additional $50 million." Bush recently said that he has not been "focused"
on fundraising for his library, but that he would "probably
take some foreign money" to cover the library's costs. Indeed, in
November 2006, the New York Daily News reported that Bush hoped to get
roughly $250 million in "megadonations"
from key allies in the Persian Gulf.
JUSTICE -- A
SHCROFT
DEFENDS NO-BID CONTRACT FROM JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: Last
fall, former Justice Department employee
and current U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Christ Christie
awarded his former boss, former Attorney
General John Ashcroft, a
multimillion-dollar no-bid contract to monitor a corporate law
settlement. Yesterday, Ashcroft defended the $50 million contract before the
House Judiciary subcommittee. "There
is not a conflict; there is not an appearance of a conflict," Ashcroft
insisted. Subcommittee Chairman Linda Sanchez (D-CA) "said the arrangement
'appeared to be
a backroom, sweetheart deal,' because Christie chose the firm without
competition." Ashcroft "repeatedly tried to talk over" chairwoman Linda
Sanchez (D-CA), "who offered the severest questioning." On Monday, the
Justice Department announced new internal guidelines relating to
settlement monitoring "to prevent the sort of conflict-of-interest
accusations that followed" the Ashcroft contract.
INTELLIGENCE --
PENTAGON BLOCKS REPORT SHOWING HUSSEIN HAD NO TIES TO AL QAEDA:
On Monday, McClatchy reported that a Pentagon-sponsored "review of more than
600,000 Iraqi documents," scheduled for release this week, confirmed that
Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda had no "operational links," even though
President Bush said
as late as 2004, "The reason I keep insisting that there was a
relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda: because there was a
relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda." ABC reports that the Pentagon
apparently doesn't want the study "to get any attention" as it has canceled
"plans to send out a press release announcing the report's release and
will no longer make the report available online." One Pentagon official
said initial press reports on the study made it "too politically sensitive."
Navy Capt. Dennis Moynihan, a spokesman for the Joint Forces Command, said,
"We're making the report available to anyone who wishes to have it, and
we'll send it out via CD in the mail."
Think Fast
"A House committee
will question three Wall Street executives later today over
compensation awards reaching hundreds of
millions of dollars while shareholders bear the brunt of
billions in writedowns from subprime mortgages."
Alleging that the
White House "made apparently false and misleading statements in court
about the White House e-mail controversy,"
CREW asked a federal judge
yesterday "to demand an explanation" about "testimony at a
congressional hearing last week" that is inconsistent with "what the White
House told a federal court in January."
In a new book, former
U.S. Attorney David Iglesias says that a former protege of President Bush
told him that he was
fired for political reasons. "Iglesias recalls Texas U.S. Attorney
Johnny Sutton telling him shortly after he was ousted. 'If
I were you, I'd just go quietly.'"
Rep. Jack Kingston
(R-GA) recently
introduced an earmark moratorium bill, but House Appropriations
Committee Chairman David Obey (D-WI) says
Kingston "privately told him he was in favor
of earmarks." "You know, David,
I am really for earmarks," Obey said Kingston told him. Kingston
confirmed the conversation.
In a CBS 60 Minutes
interview that aired yesterday, Sen.
John McCain (R-AZ) promised to release his medical records "sometime
in the next month or two." Yet so far, campaign officials have assured
reporters at least three times since March 2007 "that they would provide the
detailed information" about the senator's health, "but
they have not done so."
Average U.S.
gas prices "have reached a new high of
almost $3.20 per gallon and will likely
jump another 20 to 30 cents in the next month, worsening the pain of
consumers struggling to make ends meet in an economic downturn." Prices
increased "about 9.44 cents per gallon in the past two weeks" and "64 cents
per gallon in the past 12 months."
Action star and
right-wing activist
Chuck Norris "has become a cult figure among the U.S. military in Iraq
and an unlikely hero for some in Iraq's security forces." Comments "lauding
the manliness and virility of the actor have been left on toilet walls
across Iraq and even in neighboring Kuwait." One such
comment: "Chuck Norris puts the
laughter in manslaughter." Troops appreciate that
Norris "visited
Iraq when violence was its worst and other celebrities were skittish."
House Oversight
Committee Chairman Henry Waxman
(D-CA) questioned Blackwater's classification of its workers
as “independent contractors" rather than employees yesterday. The
designation has given Blackwater "$144
million in contracts set aside for small businesses and to avoid paying
as much as $50 million in withholding taxes under State Department
contracts."
"Unions
at the Environmental Protection Agency have pulled out of a
long-standing partnership with management," saying Administrator Stephen
Johnson "and other top managers have ignored the advice of unionized workers
and the agency's own
principles of scientific integrity."
CNN brought on
former U.S. attorney Kendall Coffey to comment on the
prostitution scandal surrounding Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D-NY). Coffey concluded
that Spitzer's chances of politically surviving the fall-out are "basically
slim and none." CNN, however, neglected to mention that Coffey quit his job
as a federal prosecutor "after allegedly biting a stripper." CNN has now
admitted that Coffey "was
probably not the right one for this story."
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ),
traveling to Europe next week, said he
wouldn't discuss differences with President
Bush while abroad. "There are obvious differences," he said.
"I certainly
won't articulate them overseas."
When a Justice
Department proposed rule requiring U.S. contractors "to
report waste, fraud or abuse they encounter while doing work for the
government" was published by the White House Office of Management and Budget
last year, it included "language that would
exempt from such reporting all U.S.
contractors who do work overseas" including in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
TOP
INTERESTING
Arizona
Activists: McCain Is a Bush McClone on Retirement Security
by
Mike Hall
Sen.
John McCain’s
so-called “Straight Talk Express” has flip-flopped off the Social Security
highway—and Arizona activists want to make sure voters know the presumptive
Republican presidential candidate is looking out for Wall Street, not Main
Street.
Several dozen members of the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and the
Arizona Advocacy
Network marched at the Social Security Administration’s
Phoenix office this morning. They were there to warn voters that McCain is
“Taking Aim” at Social Security by his recent endorsement of President
Bush’s failed and flawed proposal to
privatize the
cornerstone of the workers’ retirement security.
McCain backed Bush’s privatization plan and voted for it in 2005. But in a
2006 meeting, he told a different story. Says Doug Hart, president of the
Arizona Alliance:
We had a meeting with him about a year and half
ago, 12 of us in his office, and he said it was a bad idea, that he didn’t
favor privatization. Now he’s flip-flopped and it looks like his Straight
Talk Express isn’t so straight after all.
In
a March 3
Wall Street Journal
interview, McCain says he supports a privatization plan “along the lines
that President Bush proposed.” That could be disastrous for seniors, with
benefit cuts between 30 percent and 50 percent or about $134,000 over a 20
year retirement, says the
Alliance for Retired
Americans.
Linda Brown, executive director of Arizona Advocacy, says campaign cash is
behind McCain’s embrace of Social Security privatization.
He’s got to raise his money somewhere and the
easiest place is on Wall Street and on the right wing where ideologues want
to privatize everything.
Hart says counting on Wall Street—even as we watch a financial meltdown
caused in large part by corporate greed—just doesn’t make sense.
Under the Bush-McCain scheme, our Social Security
benefits would be thrown to the whims of the stock market. We get all the
risks but Wall Street gets all the reward.
On
the Democratic side, Sens.
Hillary Rodham
Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack
Obama (Ill.) oppose privatizing Social Security. Go to
Working Families Vote
2008 to find out more about the candidates and the issues.
Buy American Mention of
the Week
American-Made Eyewear, No Sweat Apparel, and
American Tuna
The U.S. Armed Forces’ best
kept secret is now available in the consumer market. The Original Pilot
Sunglass has been a favorite of U.S. military pilots for over 40 years.
These sunglasses are American made, performance tested and have been issued
to millions of U.S. soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen since 1958 and are
available from American Optical (www.aoeyewear.com).
When you go to the American
Optical website, be sure to click on the “Flight-Gear” banner to see the
American-made sunglasses. Other sunglasses offered on the site are not U.S.
made. Even so, the “Buy American Mention of the Week” is dedicated to
helping American consumers buy American where they can and when they can.
And the reality of today’s economy is that we can’t always find websites
that have 100 percent of their products made in the USA. This of course is
not an endorsement of globalization. Far from it! It’s an acceptance of the
world we live in, and I’m proud to live in and be an American, and we need
to take every opportunity to support other fellow Americans that live here,
work here and pay their taxes here.
Buying sweatshop-free,
child-labor free union-made clothing is no sweat at No Sweat Apparel (www.nosweatapparel.com).
Choose from footwear (low-top and high-top shoes and socks), outerwear and
accessories (belts, beanies and hats), printed tees and tanks, no logo tees
and tanks, work & casual, sweats and athletic wear as well as apparel for
kids and petites.
You can either browse No
Sweat Apparel and order online or check out their retail locations in your
area state by state. Keep in mind these product choices are sweatshop free
and not foreign labor free. Click on each individual product to see if your
choice is made in the USA.
At American Tuna (www.AmericanTuna.com)
their albacore is caught, canned and distributed by American fishermen,
which is hard to find on the shelves in the markets today, and is attractive
to many consumers. But you can find this American tuna at Whole Foods
Markets or you can mail-order at
www.heritagefoodsusa.com.
The fishing families at
American Tuna have been selling their albacore through buyers and processors
for years. The majority of their fish is exported to Spain, since the
Spanish enjoy the smaller, fatty (high fish oil) albacore tuna.
Unfortunately, the American consumer rarely had the opportunity to enjoy our
albacore until now. You can also check
www.AmericanTuna.com for other retail locations that might be in your
area in addition to a Whole Foods Market as they are always looking to cater
to smaller natural and organic stores as well.

The Senate voted
overwhelmingly Thursday (3/8) to
beef up the Consumer Products Safety Commission, which "oversees the
safety of consumer products after a spate of recalls involving imported
products."
VIDEOS
Perino Attacks Congress On Wiretapping Using A Factually
Inaccurate Slide
The Bush Debt: $7.7 Trillion
Dr. Laura blames New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's (D) wife for
her husband's prostitution scandal.

NEED
COMPUTER ASSISTANCE??
Democrat Activist Mike
Bailey is now providing “Professional Computer Support.” He can be
contacted at 502-558-4026, or
mikebailey2000@usa.net.
SUPPORT YOUR LOUISVILLE /JEFFERSON
COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!
THE ELECTIONS IN 2008 WILL BE
EXPENSIVE
SEND CHECKS TO:
LOUISVILLE /JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEMOCRATIC PARTY
640
BARRET AVE
LOUISVILLE , KY 40204
Notice to our Readers & 2008
Primary Election Candidates:
This
newsletter will carry, in this space, any Democratic candidates' notice
of events or communications (250 words or less) to our readers that the
candidate provides to the editor at
rcrider@insightbb.com
TOP
CLICK HERE FOR LATEST ISSUE OF THE "FRIDAY ALERT"
TOP
If you plan to change your
e-mail address, please let me know at
rcrider@louisvilledem.com
Your contributions of news,
comments and/or events are invited. Please e-mail such items to
Ray Crider at
rcrider@louisvilledem.com . If you know
someone who would like to be on the newsletter e-mail list, please have him
or her supply the following information to the same
e-mail address: Name, address,
phone numbers ( home , work, fax, cell), and e-mail address.
-

-
-
Publication
of
-
Louisville/Jefferson County Democratic
Party
-
Tim Longmeyer, Chairman
-
Ray Crider, Editor
-
640 Barret Ave
-
Louisville, Ky 40202
-
502-582-1999
-
-
- Paid for by the
- Louisville/Jefferson Co Democratic Party
- Charlie Horton, Treasurer
- Produced & Printed In-House
|
Not authorized by any candidate
or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Louisville/Jefferson County Democratic Party
are not tax deductible.